Community colleges, faculty deserve higher
recognition
by Dr. Tahita Fulkerson
TCC dean, instruction/accreditation services
I always read Jeff Guinn’s reports and essays
with great appreciation. His preparation and kind wit make his writing
some of the best in area newspapers.
Thus, as a community college teacher for more than 20 years, I was excited
at the prospect of reading your books editor’s essay about Cleatus
Rattan, the Texas poet laureate who teaches at Cisco Junior College,
where he has been “reluctantly teaching language arts” for
“more than three decades.”
However, by the time I had read enough of Guinn’s article to find
my friend Jim Lee’s remark that in academia “any junior
college is considered Siberia,” I knew that I had to present another
view of professional life at two-year colleges.
Guinn’s article and Lee’s comments suggest an angst and
a worldview that might be true for Rattan, but those specifics should
not be generalized to all colleges or all teachers.
Indeed, both the specifics and the generalizations of the article fly
in the face of what I know about community colleges, particularly Tarrant
County College.
Lee’s assertion that most junior college teachers “would
probably eat wood to get out” of their Siberia is colorful but
untrue, based on what I have seen in evaluating classes.
In fact, some of the best teaching in the world occurs at community
colleges. Community college teachers face their open-admissions students
with energy, humor and skill. And they routinely teach five classes
each semester.
Still, even with these loads, instructors plan field trips to local
art museums and important national geological sites. They take students
to Austin to see the Legislature in action (or inaction) and to New
York City to experience arts and theater. They oversee internships in
medical settings and develop international study opportunities in Mexico
and Paris.
With all these opportunities, community college students are not in
junior college—they are in college.
When they transfer to four-year colleges, they succeed with grade point
averages and classroom experiences that equal and often surpass those
of the four-year college’s native students.
Tarrant County College employs faculty members with extraordinarily
active, satisfying intellectual lives in addition to their professional
work in the classroom.
They write textbooks, articles, poetry, successful novels and book reviews—and
are published. They develop creative, effective Internet courses taken
by distance learners throughout the country.
They serve on local boards, teach church school classes and raise money
for charities. They serve and lead on state, national and international
committees. Our faculty include nationally known artists, alumni of
the Peace Corps and Fulbright scholars.
Few if any faculty members at TCC are ready to eat wood.
If Rattan would “eat wood” to leave his employer of three
decades, it may be because he just doesn’t understand the mission
of the institution.
At Cisco’s recent 50-year reunion, old college chums were delighted
and proud of the number of them who had completed their two-year degrees
at Cisco and gone on to complete the bachelor’s plus professional
credentials such as the CPA. One person who attended noted that the
reunion was distinctive for the successes of its returning graduates.
As for Guinn’s references to athletes at Cisco, to large spaces
allocated to welding classes or to Rattan’s poem about students
interested only in the ABCs, I’d say: Don’t worry. Cisco
Junior College is doing exactly what its community wants and needs,
in the same way that more than 1,100 other community colleges are in
the United States.
In the current issue of Community College Week, Antonio Pérez,
president of Borough of Manhattan Community College in New York, makes
the point concisely: Community colleges “meet students where they
are academically, and help them excel.”
Almost every two-year college in the nation is committed to that mission,
whether preparing students for jobs or for further education, and are
doing so at an affordable rate.
And Rattan’s unhappiness? Perhaps he might consider that poetry
is not the only vehicle to “generate strong emotion.” Good
teaching does, too.
Copyright 2004 Fort Worth Star-Telegram
Reprinted by permission.