Better uses for campaign funds
by Brian Wainstein, Editor-In-Chief
President Bush leads with campaign
funds nearing $50 million in this quarter alone.
The average donation was apparently $280.
What this means is that almost 262,000 people donated
that money.
That’s 262,000 people paying for mass propaganda
so more unsuspecting schmoes will donate their money so more people
donate theirs, leading America into a never-ending cycle of despair.
That’s a staggering amount of money about to
be wasted on 30-second commercials, pamphlets and sound bites.
Why can’t they put that money to better use?
Instead of donating to some crowd-pleasing politician,
could people not donate to the charities and causes that the candidate
says he champions?
Surely, that would be the better option.
We should judge potential presidents on their merits,
not the pretty colors shining on a piece of glass or who endorses them.
Voters should vote logically, not impulsively.
Being a techie, I am all for the Terminator running California,
but how many Californians voted for him because of his political platform?
Oh, wait, he never had one.
California’s Last Action Hero may have won thanks
to his competition. He was the least bad candidate. His opponents included
a former adult actress, Different Strokes actor Gary Coleman and Hustler
publisher Larry Flynt.
We mustn’t forget the old lieutenant governor,
but what Americans want is someone who looks good on TV, not someone
with, heaven forbid, experience.
Time will show how wise the public’s voting
decision was; I am just disappointed with the general public’s
reasons for voting for whom they did.
If people thought more before they voted, all of the
money wasted on campaign propaganda would be turned to better use.
That money could build and finance an asylum for insane
former politicians. And we’d have enough left over to buy hundreds
of acres of rain forest, protecting it from demolition, not to mention
the other few hundred saved from an untimely end as pamphlets. And with
the last few million, we could always feed the hungry and build a homeless
shelter.
But why do that when the Bush campaign needs new headquarters?