Authorities thwart appearance
of marijuana panelist
NE Phi Theta Kappa sponsors debates
on medical legalization of grass
by Jason Albus, Reporter
Fearing he would be arrested for possession
of medically prescribed marijuana, a Vietnam War veteran declined to
appear on NE Campus recently and participated in a debate on the drug
over the telephone.
George McMahon planned to present in person, but county
officials threatened to arrest him for possession of marijuana provided
to him legally by the U.S. government.
Marijuana grabbed the attention of more than 200 students last week
during Head, Fed & Med: Views on Marijuana Legalization, a debate
presented by Phi Theta Kappa.
McMahon, a Vietnam War veteran, has federal approval
for a medical marijuana prescription. The U.S. government sends him
300 marijuana cigarettes each month to fill the prescription. He faced
arrest based on state and local laws against the possession of marijuana
for any purpose.
Sgt. Tony Woolum, a panelist at the event, has been a TCC police officer
for nine years.
“Our job as police is to enforce the law,”
he said. “Possession of a quarter of an ounce is a class B misdemeanor
punishable by jail and fines.”
Christopher Largen, an author on the panel, said the
recognition of medical marijuana differs across government levels. Largen
said McMahon would have ultimately been cleared of the charges but would
have suffered physically while in jail.
“When I met him, George suffered from back spasms
and intense pain,” he said. “George was taking over 17 medications
and had been unable to eat for so long that doctors had given him less
than a day to live.”
A fellow patient gave McMahon a marijuana cigarette,
and in 15 minutes he was able to eat, Largen said. McMahon later petitioned
the U.S. government to grant him access to legal marijuana. He is one
of 35 Americans given legal marijuana by the U.S. government, according
to Largen.
Howard Woolridge, a retired police officer, was the
third panelist.
“Due to patient privacy rights, the government
cannot provide information about an individual’s prescription
or medical condition. There is no certificate or other identification
to confirm the approval for patients such as McMahon,” he said.
McMahon commented on his situation.
“I cannot tell you how it feels to hide despite
having federal protection. It is a horrible feeling … it’s
only a plant,” he said.
Dr. Bryon Adinoff, professor of drug abuse studies
at Southwest Texas State University, was the fourth panelist. Adinoff
said scientists first discovered chemical receptors for the active ingredients
in marijuana in 1988. At this time, no studies have met the approval
process of the FDA, he said.
“There are risks to using marijuana,”
Adinoff said, “It negatively affects the lungs and cardiovascular
systems. Cigarettes and alcohol pose greater health concerns,”
he said. “The harm from smoking marijuana is not a good argument
to justify making it a crime.”
Adinoff said more than 400,000 people die each year
from smoking cigarettes and more than 100,000 die from alcohol. Zero
deaths are attributed to marijuana, according to Adinoff. He said a
fatal overdose on marijuana is almost impossible.
Woolridge supports legalization.
“Possession of personal amounts of marijuana
should not be a crime. If a person is driving while high from pot, then
he will be arrested for the crime of DUI,” he said.
Woolridge said 44,000 people are arrested for possession
of marijuana each year in Texas. He pointed out it costs taxpayers over
$25,000 a year per prisoner in jail. The time spent
on arresting and investigating people for drugs could be spent on crimes
like rape or murder, Woolridge said.
“For every 15 cars we search for marijuana, we find
only one in possession,” he said. “For every drug dealer
we take off the streets, another dealer is right there to replace him.”
Woolridge, a member of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition,
was a police officer for 15 years. He called the current drug environment
the “aftermath of Prohibition” and the current campaign
against drugs a “failed public policy.”
When Woolridge asked the audience if anyone felt America
was winning the war on drugs, the crowd was silent. Woolridge said this
was the same way all crowds react to the question.
“Drugs are cheaper, stronger and easier to buy than
ever before. In 1980 it cost $125 for a gram of low quality cocaine,”
he said. “Today it costs $40 for a gram of high quality cocaine.
The war on drugs has had no effect on the availability of drugs.”
Woolridge said proper legislation could positively
affect taxpayers.
“I do not want to pay for his jail if Rush Limbaugh
is convicted of using illegal prescription drugs as his choice of pain-killer
instead of Jack Daniels,” he said. “House Bill 2668 is a
step toward reducing the taxpayer burden by sentencing people to rehab
instead of jail for marijuana possession.”
The panel said two major opponents to legalization
of medical marijuana are the alcohol and pharmaceutical industries.
Woolridge believes people would shift from alcohol to pot if it were
legal. Adinoff said pharmaceutical companies could not patent natural
resources like the marijuana plant. These organizations were said to
fund major political action committees that lobby against medical marijuana.
Yvonne Cook, NE government instructor, gave extra
credit to her students if they attended and wrote a summary of the debate.
“Students need to consider how the government
spends our money,” she said. “The percentage of prisoners
for marijuana possession is very high. Some say our deficits could be
reduced by legalization and taxation of marijuana.”
The Phi Tau chapter of the Phi Theta Kappa honors
society will hold another debate over the legalization of marijuana
in November. It will be the last of five fall satellite seminars presented
on all four campuses.